<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #dearpublisher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glinda Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Glinda Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Great blog post! 

Thank you for taking the time to answer the #dearpublisher questions. I know what you mean about the "internet bitching." I hesitate to bring up ebooks at times for that very reason. 

I know that I don't expect the backlist titles to magically appear as ebooks, but I am pleased to hear that they are on your radar. There are a lot of older books that I would like to read (and re-read, for that matter)!

Thanks again for the insights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog post! </p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to answer the #dearpublisher questions. I know what you mean about the &#8220;internet bitching.&#8221; I hesitate to bring up ebooks at times for that very reason. </p>
<p>I know that I don&#8217;t expect the backlist titles to magically appear as ebooks, but I am pleased to hear that they are on your radar. There are a lot of older books that I would like to read (and re-read, for that matter)!</p>
<p>Thanks again for the insights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stujallen</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Stujallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-830</guid>
		<description>some great answers harvey ,always nice to hear from publishers what they think ,all the best stu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some great answers harvey ,always nice to hear from publishers what they think ,all the best stu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Liz, you tell it like it is as always. Of course we'd love it if all of our books were popular or became vogue, but first and foremost we want to publish them because (in italics, underlined, with flashing Vegas lights) THEY ARE GOOD BOOKS! Otherwise we might as well all go home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, you tell it like it is as always. Of course we&#8217;d love it if all of our books were popular or became vogue, but first and foremost we want to publish them because (in italics, underlined, with flashing Vegas lights) THEY ARE GOOD BOOKS! Otherwise we might as well all go home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-828</guid>
		<description>The thing about Windmill and the books they publish: it's high quality.  Having been able to chat to Harvey and visiting the blog and seeing the books they send out to reviewers, you get a sense that it is very personal. 

And it's reflected in this blogpost.  It really irked me when so many people were saying: don't just publish the popular stuff / market the popular stuff.  Excuse me, but as readers, when have we become SO lazy that we don't actually look and see beyond what is on the 3 for 2 tables?  I have found favourite books by spending a lot of time looking through shelves and picking up books and trying books I thought I'd never like, only to find myself falling for them. Also, tied in with this: independent bookshops tend to be the places where you will find a variety of different books, books that aren't widely promoted because they can cater to their unique clientelle. 

It's pure laziness, in my opinion, for readers to accuse publishers of only publishing popular / in vogue books.  Look further than what you think you see and you'll be surprised what you may find. 

Erm.  That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about Windmill and the books they publish: it&#8217;s high quality.  Having been able to chat to Harvey and visiting the blog and seeing the books they send out to reviewers, you get a sense that it is very personal. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s reflected in this blogpost.  It really irked me when so many people were saying: don&#8217;t just publish the popular stuff / market the popular stuff.  Excuse me, but as readers, when have we become SO lazy that we don&#8217;t actually look and see beyond what is on the 3 for 2 tables?  I have found favourite books by spending a lot of time looking through shelves and picking up books and trying books I thought I&#8217;d never like, only to find myself falling for them. Also, tied in with this: independent bookshops tend to be the places where you will find a variety of different books, books that aren&#8217;t widely promoted because they can cater to their unique clientelle. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pure laziness, in my opinion, for readers to accuse publishers of only publishing popular / in vogue books.  Look further than what you think you see and you&#8217;ll be surprised what you may find. </p>
<p>Erm.  That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Great answers! Thank you for taking the time out of your day to answer them for us and shed some light into what you are looking for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great answers! Thank you for taking the time out of your day to answer them for us and shed some light into what you are looking for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Kavey! I agree, newspapers are different things to blogs: I often tell authors that a blog is much more like having a book recommended to you by a friend. It's a very 'word-of-mouth' form, which anyone in publishing will tell you is one of the most powerful ways to sell books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Kavey! I agree, newspapers are different things to blogs: I often tell authors that a blog is much more like having a book recommended to you by a friend. It&#8217;s a very &#8216;word-of-mouth&#8217; form, which anyone in publishing will tell you is one of the most powerful ways to sell books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kavey</title>
		<link>http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/index.php/2010/07/dearpublisher/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windmill-books.co.uk/?p=608#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Great post.

Always good to resist getting drawn into internet bitchfests, they seldom change anyone's opinions and just look bad.

But also nice to read your replies to some of the questions.

It's also nice to see a publisher look past pure visitor numbers when assessing a blog, and consider content, style, connection with readers... I am often asked by PRs to provide visitor statistics before they decide whether or not to send me a product, invite me to an event or whatever. I usually ignore it but occasionally try and explain that, to my mind, it's just not logical to try and judge a blog on the same criteria as mainstream media.

A national print publication - newspaper or magazine, for example - may reach many thousands of people. But of those readers, how many will actually read the product review in question? And of those, how many will have a genuine interest?

But I like to think that a blog like mine, whilst it may only have a few hundred visitors a day, has a more targetted readership. The people who visit are actively looking for opinions on the topic in question. 

I know that some of my restaurant reviews have resulted in readers visiting those restaurants and that my cookery book reviews, where I've enthused about the book, have resulted in sales.

So I've appreciated reading your comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
<p>Always good to resist getting drawn into internet bitchfests, they seldom change anyone&#8217;s opinions and just look bad.</p>
<p>But also nice to read your replies to some of the questions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also nice to see a publisher look past pure visitor numbers when assessing a blog, and consider content, style, connection with readers&#8230; I am often asked by PRs to provide visitor statistics before they decide whether or not to send me a product, invite me to an event or whatever. I usually ignore it but occasionally try and explain that, to my mind, it&#8217;s just not logical to try and judge a blog on the same criteria as mainstream media.</p>
<p>A national print publication - newspaper or magazine, for example - may reach many thousands of people. But of those readers, how many will actually read the product review in question? And of those, how many will have a genuine interest?</p>
<p>But I like to think that a blog like mine, whilst it may only have a few hundred visitors a day, has a more targetted readership. The people who visit are actively looking for opinions on the topic in question. </p>
<p>I know that some of my restaurant reviews have resulted in readers visiting those restaurants and that my cookery book reviews, where I&#8217;ve enthused about the book, have resulted in sales.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve appreciated reading your comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

